SafeReturn AllianceThe lawful path homeI need help now
Home › Does Hague apply? › Cuba
Country-pair applicability

Cuba and the 1980 Hague Convention: country by country

Cuba is a Contracting Party (in force 2018-12-01, Accession). The 1980 Convention is in force between Cuba and 14 other Contracting Parties, and not in force with 87 (no Article 38 acceptance on record). This is computed from the verified HCCH acceptance data, as of 2026-07-26. It tells you whether the treaty operates for a pair — always confirm your exact case with a qualified lawyer or the official HCCH acceptance table, and note the Convention does not cover a removal that happened before it entered into force for both States.

Verified 2026-07-05·102 other Contracting Parties·Use the interactive checker →

Convention is in force (14)

The 1980 Convention operates between these two States — a return application can be made under it (subject, as always, to the facts of your case).

Andorraaccession Argentinaratification Brazilaccession Japanratification Mexicoaccession Monacoaccession Russian Federationaccession San Marinoaccession Serbiaratification South Africaaccession Switzerlandratification Ukraineaccession Uruguayaccession Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)ratification

Convention is NOT in force between these States (87)

One side joined by accession and the other has not accepted that accession, so under Article 38 the 1980 Convention does not operate between them — a return application under it would be rejected, and a different legal route is needed.

Albaniaaccession Armeniaaccession Australiaratification Austriaratification Bahamasaccession Barbadosaccession Belarusaccession Belgiumratification Belizeaccession Bolivia (Plurinational State of)accession Bosnia and Herzegovinaratification Botswanaaccession Bulgariaaccession Burkina Fasoaccession Cabo Verdeaccession Canadaratification Chileaccession Colombiaaccession Costa Ricaaccession Croatiaratification Cyprusaccession Czechiaratification Denmarkratification Dominican Republicaccession Ecuadoraccession El Salvadoraccession Estoniaaccession Fijiaccession Finlandratification Franceratification Gabonaccession Georgiaaccession Germanyratification Greeceratification Guatemalaaccession Guineaaccession Guyanaaccession Hondurasaccession Hungaryaccession Icelandaccession Iraqaccession Irelandratification Israelratification Italyratification Jamaicaaccession Kazakhstanaccession Latviaaccession Lesothoaccession Lithuaniaaccession Luxembourgratification Maltaaccession Mauritiusaccession Montenegroratification Moroccoaccession Netherlands (Kingdom of the)ratification New Zealandaccession Nicaraguaaccession North Macedoniaratification Norwayratification Pakistanaccession Panamaaccession Paraguayaccession Peruaccession Philippinesaccession Polandaccession Portugalratification Republic of Koreaaccession Republic of Moldovaaccession Romaniaaccession Saint Kitts and Nevisaccession Seychellesaccession Singaporeaccession Slovakiaratification Sloveniaaccession Spainratification Sri Lankaaccession Swedenratification Thailandaccession Trinidad and Tobagoaccession Tunisiaaccession Türkiyeratification Turkmenistanaccession United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irelandratification United States of Americaratification Uzbekistanaccession Zambiaaccession Zimbabweaccession

Special case — China (1)

Applies only to Hong Kong SAR / Macao SAR, not mainland China. Where in China matters decisively.

China (People's Republic of)ratification
In-force status is computed from the official HCCH Article 38 acceptance table (as of 2026-07-26); acceptances can change, so re-check the HCCH source. This is general information, not legal advice — whether the Convention helps in your specific case also depends on facts a lawyer must assess (habitual residence, custody rights, and whether the removal happened after the Convention entered into force for both States). Not affiliated with the HCCH.