HomeAccountability Index › Israel
Country data · Hague Return Accountability Index

Israel

A long-standing, high-participation Contracting Party with a dedicated Ministry of Justice unit and a rare published after-hours emergency line; a positive record in U.S.-related cases.

56 / 100
56.4 / 100 2Tier 2 · Good performance
Confidence: Medium (0.48) Global rank #24 of 103 Hague Network judge
Return-performance index · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Summary & score

Israel is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1991-12-01 (Ratification). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

11
Incoming return applications (2021)
18
Outgoing return applications (2021)
4 / 4
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Transparency score / 100

Score breakdown

Israel scores 56.4 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #24 of 103, Tier 2 · Good performance. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Return effectivenessweight 80%
52.8 / 100
Legal frameworkweight 8%
87 / 100
Speed & enforcementweight 5%
50 / 100
Judicial engagementweight 3%
70 / 100
Cooperationweight 2%
50 / 100
Treaty integrationweight 2%
80 / 100
Show the exact calculation
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 52.8 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 70 × 3% Cooperation 50 × 2% Treaty integration 80 × 2% = 56.4 / 100 → Tier 2 (Good performance) · confidence 0.48

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 57% of 14 concluded (shrunk to 47% toward the 39% global prior) → 52.8.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 14 Family Courts (+25) → 87.

Sources: החזרת ילדים חטופים (Central Authority) · דוח תקופתי בדבר יישום אמנת זכויות הילד/האג · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: the Accountability Index.

Quick facts

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1991-12-01 · Ratification
Article 38 checkNot required (ratifying state)
EU member stateNo
Central authorityDepartment of International Affairs — Office of the State Attorney — Ministry of Justice
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Case outcomes

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
11181333

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

U.S.-related cases only (CY2024) proxy data

U.S.-related cases only — four return cases involving four children in CY2024, all four resolved and none open at year end. This is NOT Israel's global caseload and 'resolved' does not necessarily mean the child was returned.

Return casesResolvedOpen at year endChildren
44 (100%)04

One access case involving three children (opened 2022) remained open at year end.

Source: U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's Issues — Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024) E2 · proxy. “Resolved” is not the same as “returned.” This covers only cases involving the United States.

Speed & enforcement

U.S. IPCA 2024: children located in under one week; judicial authorities 'regularly reached timely decisions'; decisions 'generally enforced in a timely manner'. U.S.-proxy

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Public cost & cost efficiency

Estimated — not official spending. No official Central-Authority budget line exists for Israel; every figure below is a transparent Level B/C estimate (budget confidence 0.2/1). Ministry of Justice Department of International Affairs (State Attorney) — no public budget line or FTE disclosure located.
Direct Central Authority cost estimated2,016,000–10,080,000 ILS ≈ $544,320–$2,721,600
Broad public implementation cost estimated5,040,000–40,320,000 ILS ≈ $1,360,800–$10,886,400
Returned children (denominator)3–6 proxy
national incoming return applications 2021 (11) × global HCCH return rate 39% (band 30–51%). Small-N: a per-child figure from single digits is highly volatile.
Cost per returned child (broad, est.)$226,800–$3,628,800 proxy denominator
Cost per active case (est.)$41,236–$329,891 over 33 active/handled cases
International public supportNot an EU member; pays an HCCH assessed contribution (amount not public). No inbound international public support for its Central Authority located.
⚠ Proxy-denominator warning. Per-country returned-children counts are not published, so the denominator is estimated (national incoming return applications × the global 39% return rate). This country also has a very small caseload, so the per-child figure is extremely volatile. Treat cost-per-returned-child as an order-of-magnitude indication only.
How the estimate is built (reproducible): Level B (estimated FTE × fully-loaded Israeli public-sector lawyer cost × overhead) + Level C (broad multiplier). No official budget line.
FTE 6–15 × fully-loaded cost 280,000–480,000 ILS × overhead 1.2–1.4 → direct; × broad multiplier 2.5–4 → broad public cost. FX ILS→USD 0.27 (2026-07, approx). Budget transparency 0.15/1.

Sources: OECD — Average annual wages / general government compensation (loaded-cost benchmark) E3 · secondary · HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official · U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's Issues — Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024) E2 · proxy

Central authority & legal system

Department of International Affairs — Office of the State Attorney verified

Ministry of Justice

+972-73-392-8261 / +972-73-392-8262

After-hours emergency line: +972-50-621-6419

Official website · HCCH contact details

Implementing lawHague Convention (Return of Abducted Children) Law, 5751-1991.
Court structureFamily Courts have first-instance jurisdiction over return applications.
AppealsAppeal to the District Court; further leave-to-appeal to the Supreme Court of Israel.
EnforcementReturn orders enforced through the courts and, where necessary, the Enforcement and Collection Authority / police assistance.
Legal aidState legal aid available subject to eligibility; the State Attorney represents the Central Authority.
Mediation / voluntary returnVoluntary return and settlement encouraged within proceedings.

International support

HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Transparency assessment

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Transparency score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Data quality & limitations

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • The only per-country outcome data (U.S.-proxy) covers four U.S.-related cases in 2024.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.
  • West Bank cases fall outside Convention protocols (per U.S. State Department) and are not part of this rating.

Confidence: Medium (0.68) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Sources & evidence

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024)U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's IssuesE2 · proxycooperation, speed_proxy, us_related_case_counts
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / public-records questions

Tailored requests that would raise Israel's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. What is the annual budget of the Ministry of Justice Department of International Affairs attributable to 1980 Convention casework?
  2. How many FTE staff and State Attorneys are assigned to Convention casework?
  3. How many children were physically returned from Israel under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  4. What is the average time from application to Family Court first-instance decision?
  5. How many return orders required Enforcement Authority or police action, and with what outcome?
  6. What is the annual legal-aid expenditure on Hague return proceedings?
  7. Does Israel publish national Hague statistics beyond its HCCH survey returns?
  8. What is the average enforcement time from final order to handover?
  9. How are grave-risk (Art. 13(1)(b)) defences resourced and adjudicated?
  10. What is the cost per resolved return case implied by the unit budget?

Use the data

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

This page is a data and policy analysis resource, not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional and analytical. Some data reflects cases involving the United States only and may not represent the country's full global Hague caseload. Budget figures, where shown, may be estimated and are labelled; none are shown as official government spending unless an official source supports them.