SafeReturn Alliance helps parents find the lawful path forward — verified, country-by-country guidance on the 1980 Hague Convention, from the first hours onward.
🔒 本信息仅供参考，不构成法律建议。
您不必了解所有法律术语。从您目前所处的情况入手即可。
首先，请保持冷静并按照以下步骤进行：了解应采取的合法措施、今天应该联系的人员以及不应做的事情。
获取紧急指导。 → 预防针对不同国家的具体保障措施、旅行同意和护照规定，以及何时采取行动——在相关制度受到考验之前。
请参阅预防措施。 →A lawyer, journalist, or researcher? 了解 the verified data and country intelligence →
A return application asks a court in the country where your child now is to order the child's return to their home country. It decides where custody is litigated — not who wins custody. Understanding this early protects your case.
每个成员国都设有官方办事处，负责处理返还申请，且不收取任何费用。我们掌握着经过核实的联系方式。
一位经验丰富的律师，以及在必要时，警方和领事官员。您所在国家/地区可能提供法律援助。
保管好监护权相关文件、家庭生活证明以及带有日期的时间表。不要进行跟踪，也不要采取对抗措施——合法的记录才是保护您的手段。
《公约》旨在六周内做出裁决。我们将根据贵国的实际情况，制定出切实可行的时间表和步骤。
Membership isn't the whole story — the Convention must be in force between your two countries, and for newer members an acceptance rule (Article 38) can apply. Our checker explains it honestly, and every Central Authority contact is verified and dated.
仅靠法律是不够的，还需要快速行动、充足资源、合作、预防措施、经过培训的法院以及对家庭的支持。我们发布经过核实的关于国际儿童返还机制在实践中如何运作的数据——它在哪些方面发挥了作用，又在哪些方面未能达到预期效果。
Source: HCCH statistical study of applications made in 2021 (Prel. Doc. 19A). See the full data and methodology →
An AI navigation assistant grounded only in official sources — it points you to the lawful next step and the right Central Authority, and cites where every answer comes from. It organizes information; it never replaces a lawyer or an emergency authority.
本信息仅供参考，不构成法律建议。
"My child was taken from Spain to Germany. What now?"
In-depth, sourced analysis of how the 1980 Hague Convention works in practice — landmark cases, country enforcement, prevention, and the numbers. Every article is reviewed and cited. Educational, not legal advice.
The Convention promises abducted children a decision within six weeks. The latest global data shows the average case now takes 207 days — and fewer children are coming home.
Case studyFive and a half years and a US law to bring one child home from Brazil — what it reveals about delay, the "settled child" defense, and why transparency became policy.
Case studyWar tested the Convention's core assumption — that there is a safe home to return to. How the grave-risk clause held: return to western Ukraine ordered, return to Kyiv not.
Real cases, legal doctrine, country enforcement and prevention — evidence-led analysis, sourced and reviewed.
Read the research →Documented abduction cases by country — landmark rulings and public cases, each with a verified source. Search by the country a child was taken from or to.
Search cases by country →Return rates, timelines and outcomes from official HCCH studies — with a source on every figure.
了解 the data →All 103 states, Central Authority contacts, and the Article-38 pair checker.
Open the directory →Our source hierarchy, confidence scoring, and what we will not publish without review.
Read the methodology →SafeReturn Alliance 由一位经历过跨境亲子诱拐事件的家长创立。该家长通过合法的途径，将孩子带回了家。他拥有律师、资源和坚强的毅力——但这件事几乎让他身心俱疲。大多数家长的情况不如他好。正是为了弥补这一差距，这个组织才应运而生。
我们始终以儿童的利益为先，支持合法返还、预防和问责——我们既不反对母亲，也不反对父亲。 Read our mission →