HomeAccountability Index › China (People's Republic of)
各国数据 · 海牙儿童返还问责指数

China (People's Republic of)

中国(中华人民共和国)是《1980年海牙儿童国际引诱公约》的缔约方(该公约自香港于1997年9月1日起生效,澳门于1999年3月1日起生效)。本页面集中展示了其已核实的条约地位、案件参与情况以及数据缺口。

43 / 100
43.2 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
可信度: Low (0.15) 全球排名 #95 of 103
返还绩效指数 · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

摘要与评分

China (People's Republic of) is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since HK 1997-09-01 / Macao 1999-03-01 (Continuation). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

2
Incoming return applications (2021)
9
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
透明度 score / 100

得分细分

China (People's Republic of) scores 43.2 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #95 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

遣返效果weight 80%
42 / 100
法律框架weight 8%
50 / 100
办理速度与执行情况weight 5%
50 / 100
司法参与weight 3%
35 / 100
合作weight 2%
50 / 100
条约的实施。weight 2%
50 / 100
显示确切的计算过程。
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 42 × 80% Legal framework 50 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 35 × 3% Cooperation 50 × 2% Treaty integration 50 × 2% = 43.2 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.15

Return effectiveness: no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42.

Legal framework: Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised).

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Prel. Doc. 19A — 2021 statistical study

Full methodology and every country's components: 问责指数.

要点。

Hague 1980 statusSpecial — SARs only · in force HK 1997-09-01 / Macao 1999-03-01 · Continuation
Article 38 checkNot required (ratifying state)
EU member stateNo
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

案件结果

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
291012

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

办理速度与执行情况

No per-country timing data is published for China (People's Republic of).

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

公众成本与成本效益

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for China (People's Republic of), and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

中央机关与法律体系

Central Authority details for China (People's Republic of) are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

国际支持

HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

透明度评估

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
透明度 score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

数据质量与局限性

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

可信度: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

资料与证据。

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA/关于公开记录的提问。

Tailored requests that would raise China (People's Republic of)'s confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is China (People's Republic of)'s designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

请使用这些数据。

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

本页面是一个数据和政策分析资源,不构成法律建议,也不对条约的履行情况作出法律上的认定。评分结果为初步分析结果。部分数据仅反映涉及美国的案件,可能无法完全代表该国在全球范围内处理《1980年海牙儿童国际引诱公约》相关案件的总量。如果提供了预算数字,则可能会进行估算并加以标注;除非有官方来源支持,否则不会将其视为官方政府支出。