HomeAccountability Index › Thailand
ข้อมูลของแต่ละประเทศ · ดัชนีความรับผิดชอบในการส่งตัวเด็กกลับตามอนุสัญญาเฮกปี 1980 ว่าด้วยการลักพาตัวเด็กในระดับนานาชาติ

Thailand

ประเทศภาคีที่ไม่ได้ตอบแบบสำรวจสถิติของ HCCH ในปี 2021 ข้อมูลที่มีอยู่จึงเป็นข้อมูลจากสหรัฐอเมริกาเท่านั้น ดังนั้น จึงงดเว้นการจัดอันดับโดยละเอียดสำหรับประเทศดังกล่าว

48 / 100
47.6 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
ระดับความน่าเชื่อถือ: Low (0.30) อันดับโลก #71 of 103 ผู้พิพากษาของ Hague Network
ดัชนีชี้วัดผลการส่งตัวเด็กกลับประเทศ · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

สรุปและคะแนน

Thailand is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 2002-11-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

Incoming return applications (2021)
Outgoing return applications (2021)
2 / 4
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
0
ความโปร่งใส score / 100

รายละเอียดของคะแนน

Thailand scores 47.6 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #71 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

ประสิทธิภาพในการส่งตัวเด็กกลับประเทศweight 80%
45 / 100
กรอบกฎหมายweight 8%
62 / 100
ความรวดเร็วและประสิทธิภาพในการบังคับใช้กฎหมายweight 5%
40 / 100
การมีส่วนร่วมของศาลweight 3%
80 / 100
ความร่วมมือweight 2%
48 / 100
การนำสนธิสัญญาสู่ระบบปฏิบัติweight 2%
65 / 100
แสดงวิธีการคำนวณโดยละเอียด
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 45 × 80% Legal framework 62 × 8% Speed & enforcement 40 × 5% Judicial engagement 80 × 3% Cooperation 48 × 2% Treaty integration 65 × 2% = 47.6 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.30

Return effectiveness: U.S.-proxy: 50% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 45.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62.

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (CY2024)

Full methodology and every country's components: ดัชนีความรับผิดชอบ.

ข้อมูลสรุป

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 2002-11-01 · Accession
Article 38 checkYes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair
EU member stateNo
Central authorityOffice of the Attorney General — International Affairs Department — Office of the Attorney General of Thailand
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeHCCH 2021 survey not answered — per-country data is U.S.-proxy only
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

ผลลัพธ์ของคดี

Thailand did not respond to the HCCH 2021 statistical survey, so verified global caseload figures are not available. The only per-country data is U.S.-proxy below.

U.S.-related cases only (CY2024) proxy data

U.S.-related cases only — four return cases involving four children in CY2024; two resolved, two open at year end. This is NOT Thailand's global caseload and 'resolved' does not necessarily mean the child was returned.

Return casesResolvedOpen at year endChildren
42 (50%)24

One access case involving two children (opened 2023) was resolved by year end.

Source: U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's Issues — Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024) E2 · proxy. “Resolved” is not the same as “returned.” This covers only cases involving the United States.

ความรวดเร็วและประสิทธิภาพในการบังคับใช้กฎหมาย

No per-country timing data is published for Thailand. No per-country timing data; the U.S. did not request location assistance in 2024 and reported one case before the Thai judiciary.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

ค่าใช้จ่ายต่อสาธารณะและประสิทธิภาพด้านต้นทุน

Estimated — not official spending. No official Central-Authority budget line exists for Thailand; every figure below is a transparent Level B/C estimate (budget confidence 0.15/1). Office of the Attorney General, International Affairs Department — no public budget line or FTE disclosure located; very low case volume.
Direct Central Authority cost estimated1,150,000–9,720,000 THB ≈ $32,200–$272,160
Broad public implementation cost estimated2,300,000–29,160,000 THB ≈ $64,400–$816,480
Returned children (denominator)not usable proxy
U.S.-proxy only (2024): 2 of 4 U.S.-related return cases resolved — NOT necessarily physical returns and NOT global. A cost-per-returned-child figure is not meaningfully computable.
Cost per returned child (broad, est.)Not meaningfully computable insufficient return data
Cost per active case (est.)n/a
International public supportNot an EU member; pays an HCCH assessed contribution (amount not public). No inbound international public support located.
How the estimate is built (reproducible): Level B (estimated FTE × fully-loaded Thai public-sector cost × overhead) + Level C (broad multiplier). No official budget line; among the lowest-confidence estimates on the site.
FTE 2–6 × fully-loaded cost 500,000–1,200,000 THB × overhead 1.15–1.35 → direct; × broad multiplier 2–3 → broad public cost. FX THB→USD 0.028 (2026-07, approx). Budget transparency 0.05/1.

Sources: UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office / HCCH Central Authorities directory — Thailand Central Authority — Office of the Attorney General, International Affairs Department (Child abduction in Thailand) E2 · official · OECD — Average annual wages / general government compensation (loaded-cost benchmark) E3 · secondary · U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's Issues — Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024) E2 · proxy

หน่วยงานกลางและระบบกฎหมาย

Office of the Attorney General — International Affairs Department verified

Office of the Attorney General of Thailand

HCCH contact details

Implementing lawChild Abduction Act B.E. 2555 (2012) — Thailand's implementing legislation for the 1980 Convention.
Court structureThe Central Juvenile and Family Court (Bangkok) hears return applications.
AppealsAppeals within the juvenile and family court system — detail not independently verified.
EnforcementEnforcement mechanism not independently verified; requesting states have reported communication delays.
Legal aidAvailability for Convention cases not independently verified.
Mediation / voluntary returnNot independently verified.

การสนับสนุนในระดับนานาชาติ

HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

การประเมินความโปร่งใส

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyNo
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsNo
Reports access casesNo
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
ความโปร่งใส score0 / 100

Did not respond to the HCCH 2021 statistical survey (absent from the responding-states table).

คุณภาพและความจำกัดของข้อมูล

  • Full ranking withheld: Thailand did not respond to the HCCH statistical survey, so there is no uniform E1 data.
  • The only per-country data is U.S.-proxy (four U.S.-related cases in 2024).
  • Central-Authority identity and legal-framework details are not yet independently verified.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

ระดับความน่าเชื่อถือ: Medium (0.56) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

แหล่งข้อมูลและหลักฐาน

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024)U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's IssuesE2 · proxycooperation, speed_proxy, us_related_case_counts
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

คำถามเกี่ยวกับข้อมูลสาธารณะ / ข้อมูลที่เปิดเผยต่อสาธารณชน

Tailored requests that would raise Thailand's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which government body is Thailand's designated Central Authority under the 1980 Convention, and what are its verified contacts?
  2. What implementing legislation governs 1980 Convention cases, and where is the official text published?
  3. How many incoming and outgoing Convention applications did Thailand handle in each of the last five years?
  4. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  5. Why did Thailand not respond to the HCCH 2021 statistical survey, and will it respond to the next study?
  6. What is the Central Authority's annual budget and FTE count for Convention casework?
  7. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision at the Central Juvenile and Family Court?
  8. What steps are being taken to address the communication delays noted by requesting states?
  9. Is legal aid available to left-behind parents in Convention proceedings, and at what public cost?
  10. Does Thailand publish any national Hague Convention statistics?

ใช้ข้อมูลดังกล่าว

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

หน้าเว็บนี้เป็นแหล่งข้อมูลและบทวิเคราะห์เชิงนโยบาย ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย และไม่ใช่การตัดสินทางกฎหมายเกี่ยวกับการปฏิบัติตามสนธิสัญญา คะแนนที่แสดงเป็นคะแนนเบื้องต้นและใช้เพื่อการวิเคราะห์ ข้อมูลบางส่วนสะท้อนถึงคดีที่มีสหรัฐอเมริกาเกี่ยวข้องเท่านั้น และอาจไม่ครอบคลุมคดีทั้งหมดภายใต้สนธิสัญญากรุงเฮกทั่วโลก ตัวเลขงบประมาณที่แสดง (ถ้ามี) อาจเป็นการประมาณค่า และมีการระบุไว้ ไม่มีตัวเลขใดที่แสดงว่าเป็นค่าใช้จ่ายของรัฐบาลอย่างเป็นทางการ เว้นแต่จะมีแหล่งข้อมูลที่เป็นทางการสนับสนุน