HomeAccountability Index › Slovenia
Podatki o državah · Indeks odgovornosti za vračanje otrok v okviru Haške konvencije iz leta 1980.

Slovenia

Slovenija je pogodbenica Haške konvencije o mednarodnem odvzemu otrok iz leta 1980 (velja od 1. junija 1994). Na tej strani so zbrani preverjeni podatki o njenem statusu v okviru konvencije, sodelovanju pri obravnavi primerov in morebitnih pomanjkljivostih pri zbiranju podatkov.

53 / 100
52.5 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
Zaupanje: Medium (0.40) Splošna uvrstitev #40 of 103 sodnik pri mreži Hague Network
Indeks učinkovitosti vračanja otrok · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Povzetek in ocena

Slovenia is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1994-06-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

7
Incoming return applications (2021)
5
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Preglednost score / 100

Razčlenitev ocene

Slovenia scores 52.5 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #40 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Učinkovitost vračanja otrokweight 80%
48.1 / 100
Pravni okvirweight 8%
87 / 100
Hitrost in učinkovitost izvajanjaweight 5%
50 / 100
Sodelovanje sodiščweight 3%
70 / 100
Sodelovanjeweight 2%
50 / 100
Usklajevanje z mednarodnimi pogodbamiweight 2%
75 / 100
Prikažite natančen izračun.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 48.1 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 70 × 3% Cooperation 50 × 2% Treaty integration 75 × 2% = 52.5 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.40

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 100% of 1 concluded (shrunk to 42% toward the 39% global prior) → 48.1.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 11 (+25) → 87.

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Prel. Doc. 19A — 2021 statistical study · Zakon o ratifikaciji konvencije o civilnopravnih vidikih ... ugrabitve otrok · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: Indeks odgovornosti.

Pomembni podatki

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1994-06-01 · Accession
Article 38 checkYes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair
EU member stateYes
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Izidi primerov

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
753318

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Hitrost in učinkovitost izvajanja

No per-country timing data is published for Slovenia.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Javni stroški in učinkovitost stroškov

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Slovenia, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Osrednji organ in pravni sistem.

Central Authority details for Slovenia are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Mednarodna podpora

As an EU member state, Slovenia operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Ocena transparentnosti

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Preglednost score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Kakovost podatkov in omejitve

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Zaupanje: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Viri in dokazi

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / vprašanja o javnih registrih

Tailored requests that would raise Slovenia's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Slovenia's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Uporabite podatke.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Ta stran je vir za analizo podatkov in politik, ne pa pravni nasvet ali uradna ocena izpolnjevanja določil pogodbe. Rezultati so predhodni in namenjeni analizam. Nekateri podatki se nanašajo samo na primere, v katerih je vpletena Združena država, in morda ne odražajo celotnega števila primerov po Haški konvenciji o mednarodnem ugrabitvi otrok, ki jih obravnava ta država. Proračunske številke, kadar so navedene, so lahko ocenjene in so označene; nobena od njih ni prikazana kot uradni državni izdatki, razen če to potrdi uraden vir.