HomeAccountability Index › Belarus
Данные по странам · Индекс Гаагской конвенции об ответственности за возвращение детей.

Belarus

Беларусь является участницей Гаагской конвенции 1980 года о гражданско-правовых аспектах международных похищений детей (вступила в силу 01.04.1998). На этой странице представлена сводная информация о подтвержденном статусе страны как участника конвенции, ее участии в рассмотрении дел и имеющихся пробелах в данных.

46 / 100
45.8 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
Уровень доверия: Medium (0.40) Мировой рейтинг #75 of 103
Индекс эффективности возвращения детей · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Общая информация и оценка.

Belarus is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1998-04-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

Incoming return applications (2021)
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
0
Прозрачность score / 100

Разбивка по показателям

Belarus scores 45.8 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #75 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Эффективность возвращения детейweight 80%
45 / 100
Правовая база.weight 8%
50 / 100
Скорость и эффективность применения мерweight 5%
50 / 100
Активное участие судебных органов.weight 3%
35 / 100
Сотрудничество.weight 2%
50 / 100
Интеграция положений договора.weight 2%
65 / 100
Покажите точный расчет.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 45 × 80% Legal framework 50 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 35 × 3% Cooperation 50 × 2% Treaty integration 65 × 2% = 45.8 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.40

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 0% of 6 concluded (shrunk to 29% toward the 39% global prior) → 45.

Legal framework: Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised).

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: Индекс оценки эффективности применения Гаагской конвенции 1980 года о международных похищениях детей..

Основные сведения.

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1998-04-01 · Accession
Article 38 checkYes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair
EU member stateNo
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeHCCH 2021 survey not answered — per-country data is U.S.-proxy only
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Результаты рассмотрения дел.

Belarus did not respond to the HCCH 2021 statistical survey, so verified global caseload figures are not available. The only per-country data is U.S.-proxy below.

Скорость и эффективность применения мер

No per-country timing data is published for Belarus.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Общественные затраты и экономическая эффективность.

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Belarus, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Центральный орган и правовая система.

Central Authority details for Belarus are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Международная поддержка.

HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Оценка прозрачности

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyNo
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsNo
Reports access casesNo
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Прозрачность score0 / 100

Did not respond to the HCCH 2021 statistical survey (absent from the responding-states table).

Качество и ограничения данных.

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.
  • This country did not respond to the HCCH 2021 survey; per-country data is U.S.-proxy only.

Уровень доверия: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Источники и доказательства.

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / вопросы, касающиеся доступа к общедоступной информации.

Tailored requests that would raise Belarus's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Belarus's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Используйте представленные данные.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Настоящая страница представляет собой источник данных и аналитических материалов, но не является юридической консультацией и не содержит правовой оценки соблюдения положений Конвенции о международных детских похищениях 1980 года. Представленные показатели являются предварительными и служат для целей анализа. Некоторые данные отражают только те случаи, в которых участвуют Соединенные Штаты, и могут не представлять полную картину дел, рассматриваемых данной страной в рамках Гаагской конвенции во всем мире. Приведенные бюджетные цифры, где они указаны, могут быть оценочными и помечены соответствующим образом; ни одна из них не представлена как официальные государственные расходы, если это не подтверждено официальным источником.