HomeAccountability Index › Portugal
Dados do país · Índice de Responsabilização no âmbito da Convenção de Haia sobre os Aspectos Civis do Sequestro Internacional de Crianças de 1980.

Portugal

Portugal é um Estado Parte da Convenção de Haia de 1980 sobre os Aspectos Civis do Sequestro Internacional de Crianças (em vigor desde 01-12-1983). Esta página centraliza o seu estatuto contratual verificado, a sua participação no volume de casos e as lacunas nos dados.

60 / 100
60.3 / 100 2Tier 2 · Good performance
Confiança: Medium (0.48) Classificação global #11 of 103 Juiz da Hague Network.
Índice de desempenho no retorno de crianças abduzidas internacionalmente · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Resumo e pontuação.

Portugal is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1983-12-01 (Ratification). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

35
Incoming return applications (2021)
40
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Transparência score / 100

Análise detalhada da pontuação.

Portugal scores 60.3 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #11 of 103, Tier 2 · Good performance. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Índice de eficácia na devolução [de crianças]weight 80%
57.1 / 100
Enquadramento jurídicoweight 8%
87 / 100
Rapidez e cumprimento das decisõesweight 5%
50 / 100
Envolvimento do Poder Judiciárioweight 3%
70 / 100
Cooperaçãoweight 2%
62 / 100
Integração do tratado.weight 2%
90 / 100
Mostre o cálculo exato.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 57.1 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 70 × 3% Cooperation 62 × 2% Treaty integration 90 × 2% = 60.3 / 100 → Tier 2 (Good performance) · confidence 0.48

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 63% of 19 concluded (shrunk to 51% toward the 39% global prior) → 57.1.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Tribunaux / Autorités administratives : de Famille et tribunaux ou d’a (+25) → 87.

Sources: Rapto internacional de crianças — DGAJ · Pelo menos 513 crianças raptadas ... últimos dez anos (dados DGAJ) · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: o Índice de Avaliação do Desempenho.

Informações relevantes.

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1983-12-01 · Ratification
Article 38 checkNot required (ratifying state)
EU member stateYes
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Resultados dos casos

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
35407789

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Rapidez e cumprimento das decisões

No per-country timing data is published for Portugal.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Custo público e eficiência de custos.

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Portugal, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Autoridade central e sistema jurídico

Central Authority details for Portugal are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Apoio internacional

As an EU member state, Portugal operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Avaliação da transparência.

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Transparência score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Qualidade e limitações dos dados.

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Confiança: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Fontes e provas.

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / questões sobre acesso a documentos públicos

Tailored requests that would raise Portugal's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Portugal's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Utilize os dados.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Esta página é um recurso de análise de dados e políticas, não constituindo aconselhamento jurídico nem uma avaliação jurídica do cumprimento do tratado. As pontuações são provisórias e analíticas. Alguns dados refletem apenas os casos que envolvem os Estados Unidos e podem não representar o total de casos da Convenção de Haia em âmbito global no país. Os valores orçamentários, quando apresentados, podem ser estimativas e estão devidamente identificados; nenhum é apresentado como despesa oficial do governo, a menos que seja corroborado por uma fonte oficial.