Resumo e pontuação.
Brazil is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 2000-01-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.
Análise detalhada da pontuação.
Brazil scores 56.3 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #25 of 103, Tier 2 · Good performance. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).
Mostre o cálculo exato.
Return effectiveness: measured return rate 50% of 86 concluded (shrunk to 48% toward the 39% global prior) → 53.9.
Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 2 (+25) → 87.
Sources: ACAF encerra 2018 com 98 pedidos ... retorno de 15 crianças para o Brasil · ACAF — Subtração Internacional de Crianças
Full methodology and every country's components: o Índice de Avaliação do Desempenho.
Informações relevantes.
| Hague 1980 status | Contracting Party · in force 2000-01-01 · Accession |
|---|---|
| Article 38 check | Yes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair |
| EU member state | No |
| Central authority | See HCCH directory |
| Latest data year | 2021 (HCCH statistical study) |
| Data scope | Global HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded) |
| Budget transparency | No public budget line located |
Resultados dos casos
HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):
| Incoming return | Outgoing return | Incoming access | Outgoing access | Total 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | 84 | 0 | 10 | 143 |
Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.
Rapidez e cumprimento das decisões
Processing/enforcement concerns underlying the U.S. noncompliance citation. U.S.-proxy
Custo público e eficiência de custos.
Autoridade central e sistema jurídico
Central Authority details for Brazil are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.
Apoio internacional
HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.
Avaliação da transparência.
| Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical survey | Yes |
|---|---|
| Reports incoming & outgoing flows | Yes |
| Reports access cases | Yes |
| Dedicated budget line | Unknown — not located |
| Return-outcome / enforcement disclosure | Not published per-country (global aggregate only) |
| Transparência score | 90 / 100 |
responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 2/3 prior studies (+20); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)
Qualidade e limitações dos dados.
- Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
- No public Central-Authority budget line located.
Confiança: Medium (0.58) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."
Fontes e provas.
| Source | Publisher | Tier | Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24) | Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) | E1 · official | hague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required |
| Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) | HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) | E1 · official | caseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution |
| Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24) | HCCH | E1 · official | central_authority |
| Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024) | U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's Issues | E2 · proxy | cooperation, speed_proxy, us_related_case_counts |
| 1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration) | HCCH | E1 · official | speed_benchmark |
FOIA / questões sobre acesso a documentos públicos
Tailored requests that would raise Brazil's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:
- Which body is Brazil's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
- How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
- What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
- What national Hague statistics does the government publish?
Utilize os dados.
Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”