Podsumowanie i wynik
Poland is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1992-11-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.
Szczegółowe wyniki
Poland scores 49.1 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #58 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).
Pokaż dokładne obliczenia.
Return effectiveness: measured return rate 31% of 48 concluded (shrunk to 33% toward the 39% global prior) → 45.
Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 12 (+25) → 87.
Sources: Ewidencja spraw cywilnych — konwencja haska (SO) 2019-2024 (OPEN DATA) · Konwencja Haska — statystyki (archiwum BIP MS) · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State
Full methodology and every country's components: Indeks Odpowiedzialności..
Krótkie informacje
| Hague 1980 status | Contracting Party · in force 1992-11-01 · Accession |
|---|---|
| Article 38 check | Yes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair |
| EU member state | Yes |
| Central authority | Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości — Department of Family and Juvenile Matters — Ministry of Justice |
| Latest data year | 2021 (HCCH statistical study) |
| Data scope | Global HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded) |
| Budget transparency | No public budget line located |
Wyniki spraw
HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):
| Incoming return | Outgoing return | Incoming access | Outgoing access | Total 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 116 | 61 | 9 | 13 | 199 |
Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.
Szybkość i skuteczność egzekwowania postanowień
Processing/enforcement concerns underlying the U.S. noncompliance citation. U.S.-proxy
Koszty publiczne i efektywność kosztowa
Organ centralny i system prawny.
Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości — Department of Family and Juvenile Matters verified
Ministry of Justice
+48 22 23 90 470
| Implementing law | Convention applied via the Code of Civil Procedure; 2018 reform concentrated jurisdiction in designated regional courts and created a fast-track appeal to the Court of Appeal in Warsaw. |
|---|---|
| Court structure | Concentrated first-instance jurisdiction in eleven regional courts (2018 reform). |
| Appeals | Appeals concentrated at the Court of Appeal in Warsaw; a Prosecutor-General/Ombudsman extraordinary-appeal mechanism can suspend enforcement. |
| Enforcement | Enforcement concerns — including suspensions of return orders — are the basis of external cooperation criticism. |
| Legal aid | Available under general civil legal-aid rules. |
| Mediation / voluntary return | Available. |
Międzynarodowe wsparcie
As an EU member state, Poland operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.
Ocena przejrzystości
| Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical survey | Yes |
|---|---|
| Reports incoming & outgoing flows | Yes |
| Reports access cases | Yes |
| Dedicated budget line | Unknown — not located |
| Return-outcome / enforcement disclosure | Not published per-country (global aggregate only) |
| Przejrzystość score | 92.5 / 100 |
responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 3/4 prior studies (+22.5); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)
Jakość danych i ograniczenia
- The cooperation signal is a U.S.-perspective proxy (U.S.-related cases only) and a discrete statutory finding; it is shown with the statutory caveat and requires a right-of-response before any concern label is finalised.
- Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
- No public Central-Authority budget line located.
Poziom zaufania: Medium (0.58) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."
Źródła i dowody.
| Source | Publisher | Tier | Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24) | Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) | E1 · official | hague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required |
| Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) | HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) | E1 · official | caseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution |
| Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24) | HCCH | E1 · official | central_authority |
| Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024) | U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's Issues | E2 · proxy | cooperation, speed_proxy, us_related_case_counts |
| 1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration) | HCCH | E1 · official | speed_benchmark |
Pytania dotyczące dostępu do informacji publicznej (FOIA).
Tailored requests that would raise Poland's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:
- How many return orders were suspended via extraordinary-appeal mechanisms in the last five years, and with what final outcome?
- What is the average time from final return order to enforcement?
- What is the annual budget and FTE count of the Central Authority for Convention casework?
- How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
- What is the average time from application to first-instance decision at the concentrated regional courts?
- What national Hague statistics does the Ministry of Justice publish?
- How does Poland respond to the U.S. 2024 pattern-of-noncompliance citation?
- What is the legal-aid expenditure on Hague proceedings?
Wykorzystaj dane.
Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”