HomeAccountability Index › Latvia
Valsts dati · Hāgas konvencijas par bērnu starptautisko nolaupšanu izpildes indekss.

Latvia

Latvija ir 1980. gada Hāgas Konvencijas par bērnu nelikumīgu pārvietošanu līgumsliedzēja valsts (stājās spēkā 2002. gada 1. februārī). Šajā lapā apkopota tās pārbaudītā konvencijas statusa, piedalīšanās lietu skatīšanas procesā un datu trūkumu informācija.

58 / 100
58 / 100 2Tier 2 · Good performance
Uzticamība: Medium (0.48) Globālais reitings #17 of 103 Hague Network tiesnesis
Rādītājs, kas atspoguļo valstu sniegumu bērnu starptautiskas nolaupīšanas gadījumos, pamatojoties uz 1980. gada Hāgas Konvenciju par bērnu starptautisko nolaupīšanu. · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Kopsavilkums un vērtējums.

Latvia is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 2002-02-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

11
Incoming return applications (2021)
22
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Pārredzamība score / 100

Rezultātu detalizējums

Latvia scores 58 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #17 of 103, Tier 2 · Good performance. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Bērnu atgriešanas efektivitāteweight 80%
54.3 / 100
Juridiskais regulējums.weight 8%
87 / 100
Ātrums un izpildes efektivitāteweight 5%
50 / 100
Tiesu iestāžu iesaisteweight 3%
80 / 100
Sadarbībaweight 2%
62 / 100
Konvencijas noteikumu iekļaušana nacionālajās tiesību normās.weight 2%
75 / 100
Parādiet precīzo aprēķinu.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 54.3 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 80 × 3% Cooperation 62 × 2% Treaty integration 75 × 2% = 58 / 100 → Tier 2 (Good performance) · confidence 0.48

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 60% of 15 concluded (shrunk to 49% toward the 39% global prior) → 54.3.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 1 (+25) → 87.

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Prel. Doc. 19A — 2021 statistical study · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: Atbildības indekss.

Īsa informācija

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 2002-02-01 · Accession
Article 38 checkYes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair
EU member stateYes
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Lietu iznākumi

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
11222540

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Ātrums un izpildes efektivitāte

No per-country timing data is published for Latvia.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Sabiedrības izmaksas un izmaksu efektivitāte.

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Latvia, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Centrālā iestāde un tiesību sistēma.

Central Authority details for Latvia are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Starptautiska atbalsta sniegšana

As an EU member state, Latvia operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Pārredzamības novērtējums

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Pārredzamība score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 3/3 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Datu kvalitāte un ierobežojumi.

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Uzticamība: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Avoti un pierādījumi.

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / jautājumi par publiski pieejamu informāciju

Tailored requests that would raise Latvia's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Latvia's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Izmantojiet datus.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Šī lapa ir datu un politikas analīzes resurss, nevis juridiska konsultācija vai juridisks noteikums par līguma izpildes atbilstību. Rezultāti ir provizoriski un paredzēti analītiskajiem mērķiem. Daļa datu attiecas tikai uz lietām, kurās iesaistītas Amerikas Savienotās Valstis, un var neatspoguļot pilnīgu valsts globālo gadījumu skaitu Hāgas konvencijas par starptautisku bērnu nolaupšanu ietvaros. Budžeta dati, ja tie ir norādīti, var būt tikai aptuveni aprēķināti un tiem ir atbilstoša marķējums; neviens no tiem netiek uzrādīts kā oficiāli valsts izdevumi, ja vien to neatbalsta oficiāls avots.