HomeAccountability Index › Republic of Korea
국가별 자료 · 헤이그 아동 반환 책임 지수

Republic of Korea

대한민국은 1980년 헤이그 아동 국제 유괴 협약의 당사국이며(2013년 3월 1일부터 발효됨), 본 페이지에서는 해당 국가의 협약 이행 현황, 사건 처리 참여도 및 데이터 부족 사항을 종합적으로 제시합니다.

54 / 100
54 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
신뢰도: Medium (0.40) 전 세계 순위 #33 of 103 U.S. noncompliance
국제 아동 유괴 사건 처리 성과 지수 · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

요약 및 점수

Republic of Korea is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 2013-03-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

1
Incoming return applications (2021)
3
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
투명성 score / 100

점수 세부 내역

Republic of Korea scores 54 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #33 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

국제 아동 유괴 사건에 대한 각국의 대응 효과성weight 80%
51.4 / 100
법적 체계weight 8%
87 / 100
신속성 및 집행력weight 5%
68 / 100
사법부의 적극적인 참여weight 3%
35 / 100
1980년 헤이그 아동 국제 유괴 협약에 따라 각 국가가 국제적으로 유괴된 아동을 얼마나 잘 반환하는지를 평가하는 공개 지수입니다.weight 2%
25 / 100
조약의 국내법 체계 통합weight 2%
50 / 100
1980년 헤이그 아동 국제 유괴 협약에 따라 각 국가가 국제적으로 유괴된 아동을 얼마나 효과적으로 반환하는지 평가하는 공개 지수 등급입니다. 정확한 계산 과정을 보여주십시오.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 51.4 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 68 × 5% Judicial engagement 35 × 3% Cooperation 25 × 2% Treaty integration 50 × 2% = 54 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.40

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 75% of 4 concluded (shrunk to 46% toward the 39% global prior) → 51.4.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — One designated court (Seoul Family Court) (+25) → 87.

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Prel. Doc. 19A — 2021 statistical study · Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (CY2024) · 법무부 (Ministry of Justice) — Hague Central Authority

Full methodology and every country's components: 책임성 지수.

주요 정보

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 2013-03-01 · Accession
Article 38 checkYes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair
EU member stateNo
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

사건 결과

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
13116

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

신속성 및 집행력

Processing/enforcement concerns underlying the U.S. noncompliance citation. U.S.-proxy

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

공공 비용 및 비용 효율성

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Republic of Korea, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

중앙기관 및 법률 시스템

Central Authority details for Republic of Korea are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

국제적 지원

HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

투명성 평가

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
투명성 score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 1/1 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

데이터 품질 및 한계점

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

신뢰도: Medium (0.58) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

출처 및 증거 자료

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024)U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's IssuesE2 · proxycooperation, speed_proxy, us_related_case_counts
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / 정보 공개 관련 질의

Tailored requests that would raise Republic of Korea's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Republic of Korea's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

1980년 헤이그 아동 국제 유괴 협약에 따라 각 국가가 국제적으로 유괴된 아동을 얼마나 효과적으로 반환하는지 평가하는 공개 지수를 활용하십시오.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

본 페이지는 법률 자문이 아니며 조약 준수 여부에 대한 법적 판단을 내리는 자료가 아닙니다. 데이터 및 정책 분석 자료를 제공하는 데 목적이 있습니다. 점수는 잠정적인 분석 결과이며, 일부 데이터는 미국과 관련된 사건만을 반영하므로 해당 국가의 전체 헤이그 협약 관련 사건을 대표하지 않을 수 있습니다. 예산 통계는 제시된 경우 추정치일 수 있으며, 이에 대한 설명이 포함되어 있습니다. 공식 출처에 의해 뒷받침되지 않는 한, 어떠한 예산 통계도 정부의 공식 지출로 간주되지 않습니다.