Dati relativi ai singoli paesi · Indice di valutazione dell’efficacia dei meccanismi di restituzione nell’ambito della Convenzione dell’Aia del 1980 in materia di sottrazione internazionale di minori.

Italy

L'Italia è uno Stato contraente della Convenzione dell'Aia del 1980 sulle sottrazioni internazionali di minori (in vigore dal 1995-05-01). In questa pagina sono raccolte le informazioni verificate relative allo status giuridico, al numero di casi trattati e alle lacune informative.

52 / 100
51.5 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
Affidabilità: High (0.62) Classifica mondiale #41 of 103 giudice della rete dell’Aia
Indice di efficacia nella procedura di restituzione · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Riepilogo e punteggio

Italy is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1995-05-01 (Ratification). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

65
Incoming return applications (2021)
91
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Trasparenza score / 100

Punteggio dettagliato

Italy scores 51.5 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #41 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Efficacia nella procedura di restituzioneweight 80%
45 / 100
Quadro normativoweight 8%
87 / 100
Rapidità ed efficacia nell’applicazione delle misureweight 5%
68 / 100
Coinvolgimento delle autorità giudiziarie.weight 3%
70 / 100
Cooperazioneweight 2%
62 / 100
Integrazione del trattatoweight 2%
90 / 100
Mostra il calcolo esatto.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 45 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 68 × 5% Judicial engagement 70 × 3% Cooperation 62 × 2% Treaty integration 90 × 2% = 51.5 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.62

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 38% of 47 concluded (shrunk to 38% toward the 39% global prior) → 45.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 29 first-instance courts (+25) → 87.

Sources: Statistiche — Sottrazione internazionale di minori · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: l’Indice di valutazione dell’adempimento.

Informazioni essenziali

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1995-05-01 · Ratification
Article 38 checkNot required (ratifying state)
EU member stateYes
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Esito delle controversie

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
6591515176

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Rapidità ed efficacia nell’applicazione delle misure

No per-country timing data is published for Italy.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Costi per lo Stato e rapporto costo-efficacia.

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Italy, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Autorità centrale e sistema giuridico

Central Authority details for Italy are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Sostegno internazionale

As an EU member state, Italy operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Valutazione della trasparenza

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Trasparenza score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Qualità e limiti dei dati.

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Affidabilità: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Fonti e prove.

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / domande relative all’accesso agli atti pubblici

Tailored requests that would raise Italy's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Italy's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Utilizzi i dati.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Questa pagina costituisce una risorsa per l’analisi di dati e politiche, ma non fornisce consulenza legale né rappresenta un parere legale sulla conformità al trattato. I punteggi sono provvisori e hanno valore analitico. Alcuni dati si riferiscono esclusivamente ai casi che coinvolgono gli Stati Uniti e potrebbero non rappresentare il quadro completo dei casi relativi alla Convenzione dell’Aia del 1980 sull’abuso di minori a livello globale. Le cifre relative al bilancio, ove indicate, possono essere stimate e sono contrassegnate come tali; nessuna di esse è presentata come spesa ufficiale del governo a meno che non sia supportata da una fonte ufficiale.