| 1 | New Zealand |
72.7 | T1 |
75.5 | 50 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.35 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 75.5 | measured court-order (×0.9) rate 70% → 75.5. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 68 | U.S.: timely → 68. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 72.7 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.35.
|
| 2 | Belgium |
68.5 | T1 |
67.7 | 87 | 70 | 90 |
Tinggi 0.75 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 67.7 | measured return rate 78% of 27 concluded (shrunk to 62% toward the 39% global prior) → 67.7. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Tribunaux / Autorités administratives : Six tribunaux en tribunaux ou (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 68.5 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.75.
|
| 3 | Japan |
66.5 | T2 |
63.6 | 87 | 80 | 80 |
Tinggi 0.70 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 63.6 | measured return rate 60% of 180 concluded (shrunk to 58% toward the 39% global prior) → 63.6. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 2 designated courts (Tokyo, Osaka) (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 68 | U.S.: timely → 68. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 66.5 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.7.
|
| 4 | Dominican Republic |
66.4 | T2 |
64.2 | 87 | 70 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 64.2 | measured return rate 91% of 11 concluded (shrunk to 59% toward the 39% global prior) → 64.2. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — J4 Tribunales (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 68 | U.S.: timely → 68. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 66.4 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 5 | Australia |
64.4 | T2 |
62.1 | 87 | 80 | 80 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 62.1 | measured return rate 64% of 44 concluded (shrunk to 56% toward the 39% global prior) → 62.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Federal Circuit & Family Court of Australia (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (3 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 64.4 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.62.
|
| 6 | Germany |
64.4 | T2 |
61.9 | 87 | 80 | 90 |
Tinggi 0.60 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 61.9 | measured return rate 60% of 78 concluded (shrunk to 56% toward the 39% global prior) → 61.9. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 22 designated first-instance family courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 64.4 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.6.
|
| 7 | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
63.7 | T2 |
61.6 | 87 | 80 | 80 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 61.6 | measured return rate 57% of 289 concluded (shrunk to 56% toward the 39% global prior) → 61.6. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — High Court, Family Division (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (9 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 63.7 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.62.
|
| 8 | Uruguay |
61.9 | T2 |
62.3 | 62 | 70 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 62.3 | measured return rate 83% of 12 concluded (shrunk to 57% toward the 39% global prior) → 62.3. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 61.9 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 9 | Costa Rica |
61.5 | T2 |
60.2 | 87 | 70 | 65 |
Tinggi 0.60 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 60.2 | measured return rate 73% of 15 concluded (shrunk to 55% toward the 39% global prior) → 60.2. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — One authority (PANI) + specialised courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 61.5 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.6.
|
| 10 | Hungary |
61.4 | T2 |
58.9 | 87 | 70 | 75 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 58.9 | measured return rate 71% of 14 concluded (shrunk to 53% toward the 39% global prior) → 58.9. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 1 first instance, 1 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 61.4 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 11 | Portugal |
60.3 | T2 |
57.1 | 87 | 70 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 57.1 | measured return rate 63% of 19 concluded (shrunk to 51% toward the 39% global prior) → 57.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Tribunaux / Autorités administratives : de Famille et tribunaux ou d’a (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 60.3 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 12 | Argentina ketidakpatuhan |
59.7 | T2 |
57.8 | 87 | 80 | 80 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 57.8 | measured return rate 86% of 7 concluded (shrunk to 52% toward the 39% global prior) → 57.8. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — En Argentina existe la favor consigne el número concentración de compe (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (3 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 59.7 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.4.
|
| 13 | Romania ketidakpatuhan |
59.4 | T2 |
57.5 | 87 | 80 | 75 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 57.5 | measured return rate 55% of 65 concluded (shrunk to 52% toward the 39% global prior) → 57.5. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 2 courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (4 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 59.4 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.62.
|
| 14 | Denmark |
59 | T2 |
55.8 | 87 | 70 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 55.8 | measured return rate 64% of 14 concluded (shrunk to 50% toward the 39% global prior) → 55.8. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 24 Camily courts, 2 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 59 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 15 | United States of America |
58.9 | T2 |
58.1 | 62 | 80 | 80 |
Tinggi 0.75 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 58.1 | measured return rate 53% of 255 concluded (shrunk to 52% toward the 39% global prior) → 58.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); no concentration — Concurrent federal/state jurisdiction — any competent court (ICARA) (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (3 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 58.9 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.75.
|
| 16 | Morocco |
58.3 | T2 |
59.6 | 50 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 59.6 | measured return rate 88% of 8 concluded (shrunk to 54% toward the 39% global prior) → 59.6. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 58.3 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 17 | Latvia |
58 | T2 |
54.3 | 87 | 80 | 75 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 54.3 | measured return rate 60% of 15 concluded (shrunk to 49% toward the 39% global prior) → 54.3. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 1 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 58 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 18 | Türkiye |
57.8 | T2 |
59 | 62 | 35 | 80 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 59 | measured return rate 60% of 42 concluded (shrunk to 53% toward the 39% global prior) → 59. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); no concentration — All family courts (not concentrated) (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 57.8 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.62.
|
| 19 | Trinidad and Tobago |
57.6 | T2 |
58 | 50 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 58 | measured return rate 100% of 5 concluded (shrunk to 52% toward the 39% global prior) → 58. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (3 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 57.6 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.4.
|
| 20 | Jamaica |
57.3 | T2 |
55.3 | 87 | 70 | 50 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 55.3 | U.S.-proxy: 91% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 55.3. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — designated courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 57.3 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.3.
|
| 21 | El Salvador |
57 | T2 |
53.3 | 87 | 80 | 65 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 53.3 | U.S.-proxy: 83% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 53.3. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 1 autoridad (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 57 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.3.
|
| 22 | Guinea |
56.8 | T2 |
57.5 | 62 | 35 | 50 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 57.5 | U.S.-proxy: 100% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 57.5. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 56.8 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.3.
|
| 23 | Mexico |
56.7 | T2 |
56.3 | 62 | 80 | 65 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 56.3 | measured return rate 54% of 67 concluded (shrunk to 51% toward the 39% global prior) → 56.3. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); no concentration — Varies by federal state (not concentrated) (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (4 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 56.7 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.62.
|
| 24 | Israel |
56.4 | T2 |
52.8 | 87 | 70 | 80 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 52.8 | measured return rate 57% of 14 concluded (shrunk to 47% toward the 39% global prior) → 52.8. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 14 Family Courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 56.4 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 25 | Brazil ketidakpatuhan |
56.3 | T2 |
53.9 | 87 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.55 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 53.9 | measured return rate 50% of 86 concluded (shrunk to 48% toward the 39% global prior) → 53.9. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 2 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (7 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 56.3 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.55.
|
| 26 | Czechia |
56.3 | T2 |
55.8 | 50 | 80 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.55 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 55.8 | measured return rate 57% of 28 concluded (shrunk to 50% toward the 39% global prior) → 55.8. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 56.3 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.55.
|
| 27 | Norway |
56 | T2 |
51.6 | 87 | 80 | 80 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 51.6 | measured return rate 53% of 17 concluded (shrunk to 46% toward the 39% global prior) → 51.6. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 3 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 56 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 28 | Paraguay |
55.6 | T2 |
51.8 | 87 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 51.8 | measured return rate 53% of 19 concluded (shrunk to 46% toward the 39% global prior) → 51.8. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 17 Courts administrative authorities and judges or relevant Judges/Dec (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 55.6 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.48.
|
| 29 | France |
55.2 | T2 |
50.4 | 87 | 80 | 90 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 50.4 | measured return rate 46% of 83 concluded (shrunk to 45% toward the 39% global prior) → 50.4. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 35 designated tribunals (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 55.2 · Kinerja yang baik · 0.62.
|
| 30 | South Africa |
54.7 | T3 |
50.8 | 87 | 70 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 50.8 | measured return rate 55% of 11 concluded (shrunk to 45% toward the 39% global prior) → 50.8. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — High Courts (superior-court level) (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 54.7 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.48.
|
| 31 | Austria |
54.5 | T3 |
48.9 | 87 | 70 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.35 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 48.9 | measured court-order (×0.9) rate 42% of 128 concluded (shrunk to 43% toward the 39% global prior) → 48.9. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 16 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 65 | published durations → 65. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 54.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.35.
|
| 32 | Spain |
54.2 | T3 |
53.4 | 62 | 60 | 90 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 53.4 | measured return rate 49% of 85 concluded (shrunk to 48% toward the 39% global prior) → 53.4. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 60 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (0 Hague Network judges) → 60. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 54.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.62.
|
| 33 | Republic of Korea ketidakpatuhan |
54 | T3 |
51.4 | 87 | 35 | 50 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 51.4 | measured return rate 75% of 4 concluded (shrunk to 46% toward the 39% global prior) → 51.4. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — One designated court (Seoul Family Court) (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 68 | U.S.: timely → 68. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 54 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 34 | Croatia |
53.7 | T3 |
51 | 62 | 80 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 51 | measured return rate 100% of 2 concluded (shrunk to 45% toward the 39% global prior) → 51. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); no concentration — 76 municipal courts — general (not concentrated) (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 53.7 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 35 | Canada |
53.2 | T3 |
51.6 | 62 | 80 | 80 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 51.6 | measured return rate 49% of 41 concluded (shrunk to 46% toward the 39% global prior) → 51.6. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (4 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 53.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.62.
|
| 36 | Iceland |
53.2 | T3 |
48.9 | 87 | 70 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 48.9 | measured return rate 67% of 3 concluded (shrunk to 43% toward the 39% global prior) → 48.9. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 8 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 53.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 37 | Ireland |
52.6 | T3 |
47.5 | 87 | 70 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.55 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 47.5 | measured return rate 43% of 35 concluded (shrunk to 42% toward the 39% global prior) → 47.5. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — One court (High Court) (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 52.6 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.55.
|
| 38 | Singapore |
52.6 | T3 |
48.1 | 87 | 80 | 50 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 48.1 | measured return rate 100% of 1 concluded (shrunk to 42% toward the 39% global prior) → 48.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 2 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (4 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 52.6 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 39 | Malta |
52.5 | T3 |
48.1 | 87 | 70 | 75 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 48.1 | measured return rate 100% of 1 concluded (shrunk to 42% toward the 39% global prior) → 48.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Family Court (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 52.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 40 | Slovenia |
52.5 | T3 |
48.1 | 87 | 70 | 75 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 48.1 | measured return rate 100% of 1 concluded (shrunk to 42% toward the 39% global prior) → 48.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 11 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 52.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 41 | Italy |
51.5 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 70 | 90 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 38% of 47 concluded (shrunk to 38% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 29 first-instance courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 68 | U.S.: timely → 68. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 51.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.62.
|
| 42 | Switzerland |
51.5 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 80 | 80 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 35% of 40 concluded (shrunk to 36% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 26 and 1 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 65 | published durations → 65. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (3 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 51.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.62.
|
| 43 | Slovakia |
51.2 | T3 |
46.1 | 87 | 70 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 46.1 | measured return rate 43% of 7 concluded (shrunk to 40% toward the 39% global prior) → 46.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 6 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 51.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 44 | Sweden |
51.2 | T3 |
45.4 | 87 | 80 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45.4 | measured return rate 40% of 15 concluded (shrunk to 39% toward the 39% global prior) → 45.4. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 3 = 3 instances. (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 51.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.48.
|
| 45 | Guatemala |
51.1 | T3 |
49.3 | 62 | 80 | 65 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 49.3 | U.S.-proxy: 67% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 49.3. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (4 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 51.1 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.3.
|
| 46 | Finland |
50.6 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 70 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 0% of 2 concluded (shrunk to 35% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — One court (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 50.6 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 47 | Cyprus |
50.4 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 80 | 75 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 33% of 3 concluded (shrunk to 38% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 4 Family Courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 50.4 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 48 | Lithuania |
50.3 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 70 | 75 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 24% of 17 concluded (shrunk to 31% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 2 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 50.3 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.48.
|
| 49 | Estonia |
50.1 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 70 | 75 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 33% of 6 concluded (shrunk to 38% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 4 county courts with (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 50.1 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 50 | Nicaragua |
50.1 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 70 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 17% of 12 concluded (shrunk to 30% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Central administrative authority (Ministry of Family) (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 50.1 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.48.
|
| 51 | Belize ketidakpatuhan |
49.9 | T3 |
50 | 50 | 70 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 50 | U.S. noncompliance: 50% of return requests unresolved >12mo → 50. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49.9 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 52 | Republic of Moldova |
49.7 | T3 |
46.1 | 87 | 35 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 46.1 | measured return rate 50% of 2 concluded (shrunk to 40% toward the 39% global prior) → 46.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 1 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49.7 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 53 | Serbia |
49.6 | T3 |
46.1 | 62 | 80 | 80 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 46.1 | measured return rate 43% of 7 concluded (shrunk to 40% toward the 39% global prior) → 46.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49.6 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 54 | Netherlands |
49.3 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 35 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 33% of 9 concluded (shrunk to 37% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — One court (The Hague) (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49.3 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.48.
|
| 55 | Ukraine |
49.3 | T3 |
45 | 62 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.55 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 38% of 21 concluded (shrunk to 39% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 68 | U.S.: timely → 68. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49.3 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.55.
|
| 56 | Peru ketidakpatuhan |
49.2 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 22% of 18 concluded (shrunk to 31% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Juzgados (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.48.
|
| 57 | Bulgaria ketidakpatuhan |
49.1 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 70 | 75 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 36% of 11 concluded (shrunk to 38% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Tribunaux / Autorités administratives : 2 tribunaux tribunaux ou d’aut (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49.1 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.48.
|
| 58 | Poland ketidakpatuhan |
49.1 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 70 | 75 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 31% of 48 concluded (shrunk to 33% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 12 (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 75 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs + EU (Brussels II ter) → 75. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49.1 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.62.
|
| 59 | Luxembourg |
49 | T3 |
47 | 50 | 70 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 47 | measured return rate 50% of 4 concluded (shrunk to 41% toward the 39% global prior) → 47. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 60 | Mauritius |
49 | T3 |
45.2 | 87 | 35 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45.2 | measured return rate 40% of 5 concluded (shrunk to 39% toward the 39% global prior) → 45.2. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — family division ( 1) (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 49 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 61 | Armenia |
48.8 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 35 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 0% of 2 concluded (shrunk to 35% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 7 courts of the city (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 48.8 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 62 | Fiji |
48.8 | T3 |
47 | 50 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 47 | measured return rate 50% of 4 concluded (shrunk to 41% toward the 39% global prior) → 47. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 48.8 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 63 | Georgia |
48.7 | T3 |
47 | 62 | 35 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 47 | measured return rate 50% of 4 concluded (shrunk to 41% toward the 39% global prior) → 47. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 48.7 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 64 | Venezuela |
48.7 | T3 |
45 | 62 | 80 | 80 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 0% of 3 concluded (shrunk to 33% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); no concentration — Courts across 24 states (not concentrated) (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (10 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 48.7 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 65 | Panama |
48.4 | T3 |
45 | 62 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 0% of 3 concluded (shrunk to 33% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (4 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 48.4 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 66 | Chile |
48.2 | T3 |
45 | 62 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.48 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 38% of 8 concluded (shrunk to 39% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 48.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.48.
|
| 67 | Honduras ketidakpatuhan |
48 | T3 |
46.1 | 62 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 46.1 | measured return rate 50% of 2 concluded (shrunk to 40% toward the 39% global prior) → 46.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 48 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 68 | Russian Federation |
48 | T3 |
45 | 87 | 35 | 50 |
Tinggi 0.62 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 36% of 44 concluded (shrunk to 37% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 9 district courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 48 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.62.
|
| 69 | Greece |
47.8 | T3 |
45 | 62 | 70 | 90 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 0% of 4 concluded (shrunk to 32% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); no concentration — 63 first-instance courts — general (not concentrated) (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 90 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) + EU (Brussels II ter) → 90. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 47.8 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 70 | Colombia |
47.6 | T3 |
45 | 62 | 80 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.55 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 37% of 27 concluded (shrunk to 38% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 47.6 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.55.
|
| 71 | Thailand |
47.6 | T3 |
45 | 62 | 80 | 65 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | U.S.-proxy: 50% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (5 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 47.6 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.3.
|
| 72 | Andorra |
47.5 | T3 |
42 | 87 | 80 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Tribunaux / Autorités administratives : 7 tribunaux et tribunaux ou d’ (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 47.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 73 | Kazakhstan |
47.5 | T3 |
42 | 87 | 80 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 20 specialized inter- (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (3 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 47.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 74 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
47 | T3 |
46.1 | 50 | 35 | 80 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 46.1 | measured return rate 50% of 2 concluded (shrunk to 40% toward the 39% global prior) → 46.1. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 47 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 75 | Belarus |
45.8 | T3 |
45 | 50 | 35 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 0% of 6 concluded (shrunk to 29% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 45.8 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 76 | Monaco |
45.8 | T3 |
45 | 50 | 35 | 65 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 45 | measured return rate 0% of 4 concluded (shrunk to 32% toward the 39% global prior) → 45. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 45.8 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.4.
|
| 77 | Cuba |
45.5 | T3 |
42 | 62 | 80 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); no concentration — 148 courts — general jurisdiction (not concentrated) (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 45.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 78 | Philippines |
45.3 | T3 |
39 | 87 | 80 | 50 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 39 | U.S.-proxy: 33% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 39. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 68 designated Family Courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (5 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 45.3 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.3.
|
| 79 | Pakistan |
44.8 | T3 |
42.5 | 50 | 70 | 50 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42.5 | U.S.-proxy: 40% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 42.5. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.8 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.3.
|
| 80 | Guyana |
44.5 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 80 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (2 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 81 | Sri Lanka |
44.5 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 70 | 65 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.5 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 82 | Albania |
44.4 | T3 |
42 | 62 | 35 | 65 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.4 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 83 | Burkina Faso |
44.4 | T3 |
42 | 62 | 35 | 65 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.4 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 84 | Barbados |
44.2 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 70 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 85 | Gabon |
44.2 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 70 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 86 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
44.2 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 60 | 65 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 60 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (0 Hague Network judges) → 60. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 87 | Cabo Verde |
44.1 | T3 |
42 | 62 | 35 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 44.1 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 88 | Iraq |
43.8 | T3 |
42.5 | 50 | 35 | 50 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42.5 | U.S.-proxy: 40% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 42.5. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.8 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.3.
|
| 89 | North Macedonia |
43.8 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 80 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.8 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 90 | San Marino |
43.4 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 65 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.4 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 91 | Seychelles |
43.4 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 65 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.4 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 92 | Turkmenistan |
43.4 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 65 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.4 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 93 | Uzbekistan |
43.4 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 65 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.4 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 94 | Botswana |
43.2 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 95 | China (People |
43.2 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 96 | Lesotho |
43.2 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 97 | Tunisia |
43.2 | T3 |
42 | 50 | 35 | 50 |
Rendah 0.15 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 42 | no return-outcome evidence → neutral default 42. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 50 | no cooperation signal → 50. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 43.2 · Bukti yang beragam/sebagian · 0.15.
|
| 98 | Ecuador ketidakpatuhan |
37.2 | T4 |
30 | 87 | 80 | 65 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 30 | U.S.-proxy: 0% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 30. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Specialised Children & Adolescents judicial units (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (4 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 37.2 · Kinerja yang kurang memuaskan / adanya kekhawatiran yang terdokumentasi · 0.3.
|
| 99 | Bolivia |
35.8 | T4 |
30 | 62 | 70 | 50 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 30 | U.S.-proxy: 0% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 30. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 62 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 70 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (1 Hague Network judge) → 70. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 35.8 · Kinerja yang kurang memuaskan / adanya kekhawatiran yang terdokumentasi · 0.3.
|
| 100 | Zimbabwe |
35.3 | T4 |
32.5 | 50 | 35 | 65 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 32.5 | U.S.-proxy: 0% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 32.5. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 35.3 · Kinerja yang kurang memuaskan / adanya kekhawatiran yang terdokumentasi · 0.3.
|
| 101 | Bahamas ketidakpatuhan |
34.2 | T4 |
30 | 50 | 80 | 65 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 30 | U.S.-proxy: 0% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 30. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 80 | Judicial engagement: IHNJ member (3 Hague Network judges) → 80. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 25 | U.S. noncompliance citation → 25. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 65 | Treaty integration: accession, in force >15 yrs → 65. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 34.2 · Kinerja yang kurang memuaskan / adanya kekhawatiran yang terdokumentasi · 0.3.
|
| 102 | Zambia |
33.8 | T4 |
30 | 50 | 35 | 50 |
Rendah 0.30 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 30 | U.S.-proxy: 0% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 30. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 50 | Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised). | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 50 | no timeliness signal → 50. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 62 | in U.S. report, no delays → 62. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 50 | Treaty integration: accession, recent → 50. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 33.8 · Kinerja yang kurang memuaskan / adanya kekhawatiran yang terdokumentasi · 0.3.
|
| 103 | Montenegro |
12.6 | T4 |
0 | 87 | 35 | 80 |
Cukup Baik 0.40 | ▾ |
Bagaimana negara ini dinilai (6 komponen, skor maksimum 87):
| Komponen | Nilai | Dasar |
|---|
| Efektivitas pengembalian anak (80%) | 0 | U.S. noncompliance: 100% of return requests unresolved >12mo → 0. | | Kerangka hukum (8%) | 87 | Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 15 Basic Courts (+25) → 87. | | Kecepatan dan penegakan hukum (5%) | 40 | U.S.: delays → 40. | | Keterlibatan lembaga peradilan (3%) | 35 | Judicial engagement: not a member of the International Hague Network of Judges → 35. | | Kerja Sama (2%) | 48 | in U.S. report w/ delays → 48. | | Integrasi perjanjian (2%) | 80 | Treaty integration: ratification/succession (no Art.38 hurdle) → 80. |
overall = 0.80·return + 0.08·legal + 0.05·speed + 0.03·judicial + 0.02·coop + 0.02·treaty = 12.6 · Kinerja yang kurang memuaskan / adanya kekhawatiran yang terdokumentasi · 0.4.
|