HomeAccountability Index › Croatia
Podaci o državama · Indeks odgovornosti za povrat djece prema Haškoj konvenciji iz 1980. godine.

Croatia

Hrvatska je ugovorna stranka Haške konvencije iz 1980. o međunarodnom otmici djece (na snazi od 1991-12-01). Na ovoj stranici se prikupljaju provjereni podaci o statusu države kao potpisnice, broju slučajeva u kojima sudjeluje i nedostacima u prikupljanim podacima.

54 / 100
53.7 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
Pouzdanost: Medium (0.40) Svjetska pozicija #34 of 103 sudac mreže Hagе
Indeks učinkovitosti u vraćanju djece · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Sažetak i ocjena

Croatia is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1991-12-01 (Succession). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

6
Incoming return applications (2021)
7
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Transparentnost score / 100

Detaljna analiza rezultata

Croatia scores 53.7 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #34 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Učinkovitost povratka djeceweight 80%
51 / 100
Pravni okvirweight 8%
62 / 100
Brzina i provedbaweight 5%
50 / 100
Sudsko postupanjeweight 3%
80 / 100
Suradnjaweight 2%
62 / 100
Stupanje ugovorom u pravni sustavweight 2%
90 / 100
Prikažite točan izračun.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 51 × 80% Legal framework 62 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 80 × 3% Cooperation 62 × 2% Treaty integration 90 × 2% = 53.7 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.40

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 100% of 2 concluded (shrunk to 45% toward the 39% global prior) → 51.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); no concentration — 76 municipal courts — general (not concentrated) (+0) → 62.

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Prel. Doc. 19A — 2021 statistical study · Prekogranična roditeljska otmica djeteta — Središnje tijelo · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: Indeks odgovornosti.

Važne informacije

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1991-12-01 · Succession
Article 38 checkNot required (ratifying state)
EU member stateYes
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Ishodi pojedinačnih slučajeva

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
670114

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Brzina i provedba

No per-country timing data is published for Croatia.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Javni troškovi i učinkovitost troškova

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Croatia, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Središnje tijelo i pravni sustav

Central Authority details for Croatia are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Međunarodna podrška

As an EU member state, Croatia operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Procjena transparentnosti

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Transparentnost score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Kvaliteta podataka i ograničenja

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Pouzdanost: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Izvori i dokazi

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / pitanja o javnim dokumentima

Tailored requests that would raise Croatia's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Croatia's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Koristite podatke.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Ova stranica predstavlja izvor podataka i analiza politika, a ne pravni savjet niti službenu ocjenu usklađenosti s ugovorom. Rezultati su privremeni i analitičke prirode. Neki podaci odnose se samo na slučajeve koji uključuju Sjedinjene Američke Države i možda ne predstavljaju cjelokupni globalni broj slučajeva prema Haškoj konvenciji iz 1980. godine u toj zemlji. Iznosi proračuna, gdje su navedeni, mogu biti procijenjeni i označeni; niti jedan od njih nije prikazan kao službena državna potrošnja, osim ako to ne potvrđuje službeni izvor.