HomeAccountability Index › Monaco
Données par pays · Indice de responsabilité concernant les retours dans le cadre de la Convention de La Haye de 1980 sur la protection des enfants en cas de déplacement international illicite.

Monaco

Monaco est un État partie à la Convention de La Haye de 1980 relative aux aspects civils de la protection internationale des enfants (entrée en vigueur le 1993-02-01). Cette page regroupe les informations vérifiées concernant son statut au titre du traité, sa participation au nombre d’affaires et les lacunes dans les données.

46 / 100
45.8 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
Niveau de confiance : Medium (0.40) Classement mondial #76 of 103
Indice d’efficacité du rapatriement · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Résumé et note

Monaco is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1993-02-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

0
Incoming return applications (2021)
0
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
92.5
Transparence score / 100

Répartition des scores

Monaco scores 45.8 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #76 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Efficacité du rapatriementweight 80%
45 / 100
Cadre juridiqueweight 8%
50 / 100
Rapidité et application des mesuresweight 5%
50 / 100
Implication des autorités judiciairesweight 3%
35 / 100
Coopérationweight 2%
50 / 100
Intégration du traitéweight 2%
65 / 100
Présentez le calcul précis.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 45 × 80% Legal framework 50 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 35 × 3% Cooperation 50 × 2% Treaty integration 65 × 2% = 45.8 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.40

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 0% of 4 concluded (shrunk to 32% toward the 39% global prior) → 45.

Legal framework: Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised).

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Prel. Doc. 19A — 2021 statistical study · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: l’indice d’évaluation.

Principales informations

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1993-02-01 · Accession
Article 38 checkYes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair
EU member stateNo
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Résultats des affaires

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
00000

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Rapidité et application des mesures

No per-country timing data is published for Monaco.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Coût pour le public et efficacité des coûts

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Monaco, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Autorité centrale et système juridique

Central Authority details for Monaco are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Soutien international

HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Évaluation de la transparence

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Transparence score92.5 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 3/4 prior studies (+22.5); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Qualité et limites des données

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Niveau de confiance : Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Sources et éléments de preuve

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / questions relatives à l’accès aux documents publics

Tailored requests that would raise Monaco's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Monaco's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Utilisez les données.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Cette page est une ressource d’analyse de données et de politiques, et non un avis juridique ni une évaluation juridique du respect des dispositions conventionnelles. Les scores sont provisoires et à titre indicatif. Certaines données concernent uniquement les affaires impliquant les États-Unis et ne représentent pas nécessairement l’ensemble des affaires relevant de la Convention de La Haye traitées par le pays au niveau mondial. Les chiffres budgétaires, lorsqu’ils sont indiqués, peuvent être estimés et sont clairement identifiés comme tels; aucun n’est présenté comme une dépense officielle du gouvernement à moins qu’une source officielle ne le confirme.