Résumé et note
Belgium is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1999-05-01 (Ratification). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.
Répartition des scores
Belgium scores 68.5 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #2 of 103, Tier 1 · Strong performance. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).
Présentez le calcul précis.
Return effectiveness: measured return rate 78% of 27 concluded (shrunk to 62% toward the 39% global prior) → 67.7.
Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — Tribunaux / Autorités administratives : Six tribunaux en tribunaux ou (+25) → 87.
Sources: Statistiques 2023 — Enlèvement international d'enfants · Presque 50% des enfants sont de retour à la maison avec le soutien du SPF Justice
Full methodology and every country's components: l’indice d’évaluation.
Principales informations
| Hague 1980 status | Contracting Party · in force 1999-05-01 · Ratification |
|---|---|
| Article 38 check | Not required (ratifying state) |
| EU member state | Yes |
| Central authority | See HCCH directory |
| Latest data year | 2021 (HCCH statistical study) |
| Data scope | Global HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded) |
| Budget transparency | No public budget line located |
Résultats des affaires
HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):
| Incoming return | Outgoing return | Incoming access | Outgoing access | Total 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 51 | 5 | 9 | 93 |
Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.
Rapidité et application des mesures
No per-country timing data is published for Belgium.
Coût pour le public et efficacité des coûts
Autorité centrale et système juridique
Central Authority details for Belgium are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.
Soutien international
As an EU member state, Belgium operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.
Évaluation de la transparence
| Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical survey | Yes |
|---|---|
| Reports incoming & outgoing flows | Yes |
| Reports access cases | Yes |
| Dedicated budget line | Unknown — not located |
| Return-outcome / enforcement disclosure | Not published per-country (global aggregate only) |
| Transparence score | 100 / 100 |
responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)
Qualité et limites des données
- Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
- No public Central-Authority budget line located.
Niveau de confiance : Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."
Sources et éléments de preuve
| Source | Publisher | Tier | Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24) | Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) | E1 · official | hague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required |
| Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) | HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) | E1 · official | caseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution |
| Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24) | HCCH | E1 · official | central_authority |
| 1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration) | HCCH | E1 · official | speed_benchmark |
FOIA / questions relatives à l’accès aux documents publics
Tailored requests that would raise Belgium's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:
- Which body is Belgium's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
- How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
- What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
- What national Hague statistics does the government publish?
Utilisez les données.
Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”