HomeAccountability Index › Finland
Maatiedot · Haagin lastenpalautusindeksi

Finland

Suomi on vuoden 1980 Haagin lapsikaappausyleissopimuksen sopimusvaltio (sopimus on ollut voimassa päivästä 1994-08-01 alkaen). Tällä sivulla esitetään keskitetysti sen vahvistettu sopimusasema, osallistuminen tapausten käsittelyyn sekä tiedon puutteet.

51 / 100
50.6 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
Luottamus: Medium (0.40) Maailmanlaajuinen sijoitus #46 of 103 Hague Network-tuomari
Indeksi, joka mittaa maiden suoriutumista kansainvälisesti sieppattujen lasten palauttamisessa vuoden 1980 Haagin lapsikaappausyleissopimuksen mukaisesti. · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Yhteenveto ja pistemäärä

Finland is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1994-08-01 (Ratification). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

7
Incoming return applications (2021)
14
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Avoimuus score / 100

Pistemäärän erittely

Finland scores 50.6 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #46 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Lasten palauttamisen tehokkuusweight 80%
45 / 100
Oikeudellinen perustaweight 8%
87 / 100
Nopeus ja täytäntöönpanoweight 5%
50 / 100
Tuomioistuinten osallistuminenweight 3%
70 / 100
Yhteistyöweight 2%
62 / 100
Sopimuksen täytäntöönpanoweight 2%
90 / 100
Näytä tarkka laskentatapa.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 45 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 70 × 3% Cooperation 62 × 2% Treaty integration 90 × 2% = 50.6 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.40

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 0% of 2 concluded (shrunk to 35% toward the 39% global prior) → 45.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — One court (+25) → 87.

Sources: Child abduction · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: vastuullisuusindeksi.

Tärkeimmät tiedot

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1994-08-01 · Ratification
Article 38 checkNot required (ratifying state)
EU member stateYes
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Asioiden lopputulokset

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
7141426

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Nopeus ja täytäntöönpano

No per-country timing data is published for Finland.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Julkiset kustannukset ja kustannustehokkuus

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Finland, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Keskeinen viranomainen ja oikeusjärjestelmä

Central Authority details for Finland are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Kansainvälinen tuki

As an EU member state, Finland operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Avoimuuden arviointi

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Avoimuus score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Tietojen laatu ja rajoitukset

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Luottamus: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Lähteet ja todisteet

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / julkisuusperiaatteen mukaiset tiedustelut

Tailored requests that would raise Finland's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Finland's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Käytä näitä tietoja.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Tämä sivu on tietojen ja käytäntöjen analysointiresurssi, ei oikeudellista neuvontaa eikä oikeudellinen arvio sopimuksen noudattamisesta. Pistemäärät ovat alustavia ja analyyttisiä. Osa tiedoista koskee vain Yhdysvaltoihin liittyviä tapauksia, eivätkä ne välttämättä edusta maan koko kansainvälistä Haagin lastenpalautusasiakirjan mukaista tapausten määrää. Esitetyt budjettiluvut voivat olla arvioita ja ne on merkitty; mitään niistä ei esitetä virallisena valtion kulutuksena, ellei sitä tue virallinen lähde.