HomeAccountability Index › Estonia
Riigiandmed · Haagi konventsiooni järgimise indeks (rahvusvahelise lapse röövimise alal)

Estonia

Eesti on 1980. aasta Haagi lapse röövimise konventsiooni osaline riik (konventsioon jõustus 1. juulil 2001). Käesoleval lehel koondatakse teave selle kohta, kas Eesti täidab kohustusi, mis tulenevad konventsioonist, milline on selle osalus juhtumite lahendamises ning millised andmelüüngad esinevad.

50 / 100
50.1 / 100 3Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence
Usaldus: Medium (0.40) Ülemaailmne edetabel #49 of 103 Hague Network-i kohtunik
Laste tagasisaatmise tulemuslikkuse indeks · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Kokkuvõte ja tulemus

Estonia is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 2001-07-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

7
Incoming return applications (2021)
11
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Läbipaistvus score / 100

Hindepunktide jaotus

Estonia scores 50.1 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #49 of 103, Tier 3 · Mixed / partial evidence. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Laste tagasisaatmise tõhususweight 80%
45 / 100
Õiguslik raamistikweight 8%
87 / 100
Kiirus ja täitmineweight 5%
50 / 100
Kohtute kaasamineweight 3%
70 / 100
Koostööweight 2%
50 / 100
Lepingu rakendamineweight 2%
75 / 100
Näita täpset arvutust.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 45 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 70 × 3% Cooperation 50 × 2% Treaty integration 75 × 2% = 50.1 / 100 → Tier 3 (Mixed / partial evidence) · confidence 0.40

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 33% of 6 concluded (shrunk to 38% toward the 39% global prior) → 45.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — 4 county courts with (+25) → 87.

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Prel. Doc. 19A — 2021 statistical study · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: vastutusindeks.

Olulised faktid

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 2001-07-01 · Accession
Article 38 checkYes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair
EU member stateYes
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Juhtumite tulemused

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
7112121

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Kiirus ja täitmine

No per-country timing data is published for Estonia.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Avaliku sektori kulud ja kulutõhusus.

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Estonia, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Keskpädev asutus ja õigussüsteem

Central Authority details for Estonia are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Rahvusvaheline toetus

As an EU member state, Estonia operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Läbipaistvuse hindamine

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Läbipaistvus score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 3/3 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Andmete kvaliteet ja piirangud

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Usaldus: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Allikad ja tõendusmaterjalid

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / avaliku teabe taotlused

Tailored requests that would raise Estonia's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Estonia's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Kasutage neid andmeid.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

See leht on andmete ja poliitika analüüsi allikas, mitte juriidiline nõustamine ega õiguslik hinnang lepingu täitmise kohta. Tulemused on esialgsed ja analüütilised. Mõned andmed kajastavad ainult juhtumeid, milles osaleb Ühendriigid, ning ei pruugi anda täielikku ülevaadet riigi rahvusvahelises ulatuses käsitletavatest Haagi konventsiooni alustel tekkivatest laste tagasiviimise juhtumitest. Eelarveandmed, kui need on esitatud, võivad olla hinnangulised ja neid on märgitud; ühtegi neist ei ole näidatud ametliku valitsuse kulutusena, välja arvatud juhul, kui seda toetab ametlik allikas.