HomeAccountability Index › Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Datos del país · Índice de Rendición de Cuentas sobre el Cumplimiento de la Convención de La Haya relativa a los Aspectos Civiles del Secuestro Internacional de Menores de 1980.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Bolivia (Estado Plurinacional de) es un Estado parte del Convenio de La Haya de 1980 sobre los aspectos civiles de la abducción internacional de menores (en vigor desde el 01-10-2016). En esta página se centraliza su situación verificada en relación con el tratado, su participación en los casos y las lagunas existentes en los datos.

36 / 100
35.8 / 100 4Tier 4 · Weak performance / documented concern
Confianza: Low (0.30) Clasificación mundial #99 of 103 Juez de la Red del Convenio de La Haya (Hague Network)
Índice de rendimiento en la restitución de menores · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Resumen y puntuación

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 2016-10-01 (Accession), with an Article 38 acceptance check required for some country pairs. Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

Incoming return applications (2021)
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
0
Transparencia score / 100

Desglose de la puntuación

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) scores 35.8 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #99 of 103, Tier 4 · Weak performance / documented concern. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Eficacia en la restituciónweight 80%
30 / 100
Marco jurídicoweight 8%
62 / 100
Rapidez y cumplimiento.weight 5%
50 / 100
Participación del poder judicial.weight 3%
70 / 100
Cooperaciónweight 2%
62 / 100
Integración del tratado.weight 2%
50 / 100
Muestre el cálculo exacto.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 30 × 80% Legal framework 62 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 70 × 3% Cooperation 62 × 2% Treaty integration 50 × 2% = 35.8 / 100 → Tier 4 (Weak performance / documented concern) · confidence 0.30

Return effectiveness: U.S.-proxy: 0% of U.S.-related cases resolved (small sample, held 30–60) → 30.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentration not stated in profile (+0) → 62.

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24)

Full methodology and every country's components: el Índice de Rendición de Cuentas.

Datos relevantes.

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 2016-10-01 · Accession
Article 38 checkYes — confirm acceptance for your specific country pair
EU member stateNo
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeHCCH 2021 survey not answered — per-country data is U.S.-proxy only
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Resultados de los casos

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) did not respond to the HCCH 2021 statistical survey, so verified global caseload figures are not available. The only per-country data is U.S.-proxy below.

Rapidez y cumplimiento.

No per-country timing data is published for Bolivia (Plurinational State of).

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Coste público y eficiencia en cuanto a costes.

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Bolivia (Plurinational State of), and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Autoridad central y sistema jurídico.

Central Authority details for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Apoyo internacional.

HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Evaluación de la transparencia.

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyNo
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsNo
Reports access casesNo
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Transparencia score0 / 100

Did not respond to the HCCH 2021 statistical survey (absent from the responding-states table).

Calidad de los datos y limitaciones.

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.
  • This country did not respond to the HCCH 2021 survey; per-country data is U.S.-proxy only.

Confianza: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Fuentes y pruebas.

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / preguntas sobre el acceso a la información pública

Tailored requests that would raise Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Utilice los datos.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Esta página es un recurso de análisis de datos y políticas, no constituye asesoramiento jurídico ni una determinación legal sobre el cumplimiento del tratado. Las puntuaciones son provisionales y tienen fines analíticos. Algunos datos reflejan únicamente los casos en los que participa Estados Unidos y pueden no representar la totalidad de los casos relacionados con el Convenio de La Haya sobre los aspectos civiles de la abducción internacional de menores que tramita el país. Las cifras presupuestarias, cuando se muestran, pueden ser estimaciones y están debidamente identificadas; ninguna se presenta como gasto oficial del gobierno a menos que exista una fuente oficial que lo respalde.