HomeAccountability Index › Argentina
Datos del país · Índice de Rendición de Cuentas sobre el Cumplimiento de la Convención de La Haya relativa a los Aspectos Civiles del Secuestro Internacional de Menores de 1980.

Argentina

Argentina es un Estado parte del Convenio de La Haya de 1980 sobre la abducción internacional de menores (en vigor desde el 1 de junio de 1991). Esta página reúne información verificada sobre su estatus como Estado parte, su participación en los casos y las lagunas existentes en los datos.

60 / 100
59.7 / 100 2Tier 2 · Good performance
Confianza: Medium (0.40) Clasificación mundial #12 of 103 Juez de la Red del Convenio de La Haya (Hague Network) U.S. noncompliance
Índice de rendimiento en la restitución de menores · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Resumen y puntuación

Argentina is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1991-06-01 (Ratification). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

14
Incoming return applications (2021)
54
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Transparencia score / 100

Desglose de la puntuación

Argentina scores 59.7 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #12 of 103, Tier 2 · Good performance. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Eficacia en la restituciónweight 80%
57.8 / 100
Marco jurídicoweight 8%
87 / 100
Rapidez y cumplimiento.weight 5%
40 / 100
Participación del poder judicial.weight 3%
80 / 100
Cooperaciónweight 2%
25 / 100
Integración del tratado.weight 2%
80 / 100
Muestre el cálculo exacto.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 57.8 × 80% Legal framework 87 × 8% Speed & enforcement 40 × 5% Judicial engagement 80 × 3% Cooperation 25 × 2% Treaty integration 80 × 2% = 59.7 / 100 → Tier 2 (Good performance) · confidence 0.40

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 86% of 7 concluded (shrunk to 52% toward the 39% global prior) → 57.8.

Legal framework: Legal framework (HCCH Country Profile): completed HCCH Country Profile / implementing framework (base 62); concentrated jurisdiction — En Argentina existe la favor consigne el número concentración de compe (+25) → 87.

Sources: Status table — 1980 Convention (cid=24) · Prel. Doc. 19A — 2021 statistical study · Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (CY2024) · Estadísticas — Protección Internacional de los Niños

Full methodology and every country's components: el Índice de Rendición de Cuentas.

Datos relevantes.

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1991-06-01 · Ratification
Article 38 checkNot required (ratifying state)
EU member stateNo
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Resultados de los casos

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
145471893

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Rapidez y cumplimiento.

Processing/enforcement concerns underlying the U.S. noncompliance citation. U.S.-proxy

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Coste público y eficiencia en cuanto a costes.

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Argentina, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Autoridad central y sistema jurídico.

Central Authority details for Argentina are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Apoyo internacional.

HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Evaluación de la transparencia.

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Transparencia score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Calidad de los datos y limitaciones.

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Confianza: Medium (0.58) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Fuentes y pruebas.

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
Annual Report on International Child Abduction 2025 (reporting on calendar year 2024)U.S. Department of State, Office of Children's IssuesE2 · proxycooperation, speed_proxy, us_related_case_counts
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

FOIA / preguntas sobre el acceso a la información pública

Tailored requests that would raise Argentina's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Argentina's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Utilice los datos.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Esta página es un recurso de análisis de datos y políticas, no constituye asesoramiento jurídico ni una determinación legal sobre el cumplimiento del tratado. Las puntuaciones son provisionales y tienen fines analíticos. Algunos datos reflejan únicamente los casos en los que participa Estados Unidos y pueden no representar la totalidad de los casos relacionados con el Convenio de La Haya sobre los aspectos civiles de la abducción internacional de menores que tramita el país. Las cifras presupuestarias, cuando se muestran, pueden ser estimaciones y están debidamente identificadas; ninguna se presenta como gasto oficial del gobierno a menos que exista una fuente oficial que lo respalde.