HomeAccountability Index › Czechia
Údaje o jednotlivých zemích · Index odpovědnosti za vracení dětí podle Haagské úmluvy z roku 1980

Czechia

Česká republika je smluvní stranou Haagské úmluvy z roku 1980 o mezinárodním únosu dětí (v platnosti od 1. 3. 1998). Na této stránce jsou soustředěny ověřené informace o jejím právním postavení, zapojení do řešení případů a zjištěné nedostatky v datech.

56 / 100
56.3 / 100 2Tier 2 · Good performance
Důvěryhodnost: Medium (0.55) Celkové pořadí #26 of 103 soudce sítě Hague Network
Index ukazatelů efektivity vracení dětí při mezinárodních únosách · updated 2026-07-07
How to read this page. This is a data and policy analysis resource — not legal advice and not a legal determination of treaty compliance. Scores are provisional. Countries publish very different amounts of data; missing data lowers confidence, not performance. Resolved is not the same as returned. Where data covers U.S.-related cases only it is labelled proxy. Any budget figures shown are estimated, not official government spending.

Shrnutí a hodnocení

Czechia is a Contracting Party to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, in force since 1998-03-01 (Ratification). Its Accountability Index score is driven overwhelmingly by return performance — whether abducted children are actually returned (80% of the score) — with legal framework, judicial engagement and treaty integration as system-quality context.

14
Incoming return applications (2021)
17
Outgoing return applications (2021)
U.S.-related return cases resolved (2024, proxy)
100
Transparentnost score / 100

Rozpis bodového hodnocení

Czechia scores 56.3 / 100 on the Hague Return Accountability Index — global rank #26 of 103, Tier 2 · Good performance. Return effectiveness — whether abducted children are actually returned — is 80% of the score; the remaining 20% is system-quality context (legal framework, speed, judicial engagement, cooperation, treaty integration).

Účinnost vracení dětíweight 80%
55.8 / 100
Právní rámecweight 8%
50 / 100
Rychlost a účinnost vymáháníweight 5%
50 / 100
Zapojení soudůweight 3%
80 / 100
Spolupráceweight 2%
50 / 100
Implementace úmluvyweight 2%
90 / 100
Zobrazte přesný výpočet.
overall = 0.80·Return effectiveness + 0.08·Legal framework + 0.05·Speed + 0.03·Judicial engagement + 0.02·Cooperation + 0.02·Treaty integration (cap 87) Return effectiveness 55.8 × 80% Legal framework 50 × 8% Speed & enforcement 50 × 5% Judicial engagement 80 × 3% Cooperation 50 × 2% Treaty integration 90 × 2% = 56.3 / 100 → Tier 2 (Good performance) · confidence 0.55

Return effectiveness: measured return rate 57% of 28 concluded (shrunk to 50% toward the 39% global prior) → 55.8.

Legal framework: Legal framework: no completed HCCH Country Profile → neutral 50 (not penalised).

Sources: Únosy dětí — ÚMPOD · HCCH 2015 Statistical Analysis (Global Report) — outcomes by requested State

Full methodology and every country's components: Index odpovědnosti.

Stručné informace

Hague 1980 statusContracting Party · in force 1998-03-01 · Ratification
Article 38 checkNot required (ratifying state)
EU member stateYes
Central authoritySee HCCH directory
Latest data year2021 (HCCH statistical study)
Data scopeGlobal HCCH 2021 flows (this country responded)
Budget transparencyNo public budget line located

Výsledky případů

HCCH 2021 application flows (all Convention partners, not U.S.-only):

Incoming returnOutgoing returnIncoming accessOutgoing accessTotal 2021
14172841

Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official. These are application counts, not outcomes. HCCH publishes return outcomes only as a global aggregate (39% returned in 2021), so a per-country return rate is not shown.

Rychlost a účinnost vymáhání

No per-country timing data is published for Czechia.

Global benchmark (2021): the average return application took 207 days against the Article 11 six-week (42-day) aspiration; 24% of cases took over 300 days. Source: HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens) — Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024) E1 · official.

Veřejné náklady a efektivita nákladů

Budget data not publicly available. No official Central-Authority budget line was located for Czechia, and there is not yet enough disclosure to build even a Level-B estimate. Cost-per-returned-child is Not published. See the FOIA questions below.

Centrální orgán a právní systém

Central Authority details for Czechia are not yet in our verified directory. See the HCCH Central Authority directory.

Mezinárodní podpora

As an EU member state, Czechia operates within the EU framework (Brussels II ter / Regulation 2019/1111) alongside the Convention, and participates in the European Judicial Network. HCCH provides the multilateral framework, statistical studies, and the Malta Process. Per-country funding amounts from the EU, HCCH, UN, or Council of Europe are not published as discrete line items and are recorded as a data gap.

Hodnocení transparentnosti

Responded to HCCH 2021 statistical surveyYes
Reports incoming & outgoing flowsYes
Reports access casesYes
Dedicated budget lineUnknown — not located
Return-outcome / enforcement disclosureNot published per-country (global aggregate only)
Transparentnost score100 / 100

responded to the 2021 survey (+40); longitudinal participation 4/4 prior studies (+30); reports both incoming & outgoing flows (+15); reports access cases (+15)

Kvalita a omezení dat

  • Per-country return outcomes are not published; the 39% figure is a global aggregate.
  • No public Central-Authority budget line located.

Důvěryhodnost: Medium (0.51) — confidence reflects the strength and breadth of evidence, separately from performance. A low confidence means "we cannot yet fully evaluate," not "this country performs badly."

Zdroje a důkazy.

SourcePublisherTierSupports
Status table — 1980 Child Abduction Convention (cid=24)Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)E1 · officialhague_1980_status, entry_into_force_date, accession_or_ratification_type, article_38_acceptance_required
Prel. Doc. No 19A — Statistical study of applications made in 2021 (5th Global Study, updated Sept 2024)HCCH (Prof. Nigel Lowe & Victoria Stephens)E1 · officialcaseload, transparency_survey_participation, global_return_rate, average_resolution_days, outcome_distribution
Central Authorities directory — 1980 Convention (cid=24)HCCHE1 · officialcentral_authority
1980 Hague Convention, Article 11 (six-week decision aspiration)HCCHE1 · officialspeed_benchmark

Dotazy týkající se veřejně dostupných informací.

Tailored requests that would raise Czechia's confidence score and unlock the return-outcome and cost categories:

  1. Which body is Czechia's designated Central Authority and what is its annual Convention budget and FTE count?
  2. How many children were physically returned under the Convention in each of the last five years?
  3. What is the average time from application to first-instance decision and to enforcement?
  4. What national Hague statistics does the government publish?

Využijte tato data.

Machine-readable data for every country: countries.json · rankings.json · rankings.csv · sources.json. Last updated 2026-07-06. Cite as: “SafeReturn Alliance, Hague Return Accountability Index (provisional), 2026-07-06.”

Tato stránka slouží jako zdroj dat a analýz týkajících se politiky v této oblasti, nikoli jako právní poradenství ani jako oficiální posouzení dodržování smluvních závazků. Hodnocení jsou předběžná a analytická. Některá data se vztahují pouze na případy zahrnující Spojené státy americké a nemusí odrážet celkový počet případů podle Haagské úmluvy o mezinárodním únosu dětí, kterými se daná země zabývá v globálním měřítku. Uvedené údaje o rozpočtu mohou být pouze odhady a jsou tak označeny; žádné z nich nejsou uváděny jako oficiální výdaje vlády, pokud to není potvrzeno oficiálním zdrojem.